<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random July notes: LA Times Book Review oblivion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artscatter.com/books/random-july-notes-la-times-book-review-oblivion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artscatter.com/books/random-july-notes-la-times-book-review-oblivion/</link>
	<description>a Portland-centric arts and culture blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha Ullman West</title>
		<link>http://www.artscatter.com/books/random-july-notes-la-times-book-review-oblivion/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Ullman West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artscatter.com/?p=358#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>Alas, the LA Times we knew it...that book review section had national importance for both writers and reviewers, almost as much as the NY Times Book Review.  I suppose the money folks think we don't need two book review sections of equal importance, sort of like the Oregon State System of Higher Education thinking it's duplication if both the U of O and PSU have journalism departments.  Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, the LA Times we knew it&#8230;that book review section had national importance for both writers and reviewers, almost as much as the NY Times Book Review.  I suppose the money folks think we don&#8217;t need two book review sections of equal importance, sort of like the Oregon State System of Higher Education thinking it&#8217;s duplication if both the U of O and PSU have journalism departments.  Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
