Scatter considers the Nabokov Dilemma
Let’s just say your mother is a potter, an accomplished potter, a demanding potter. At the end of her life she started work on a new approach and made some progress. But then she took ill and joined the ceramic guild in the sky. Her last request? Destroy that last pot. What would you do? Honor her request by breaking it into a thousand pieces or honor her life’s work by keeping it?
That’s the dilemma faced by Dmitri Nabokov, son of Vladimir. To destroy his father’s last manuscript, actually the 138 index cards on which was assembling his last novel in typical Nabokovian fashion, or keep it and perhaps publish it. Perhaps you already know about this, yes? It’s made the mainstream media and the literary blogs, and the New York Times had an interview with Dmitri on Sunday.
So, should Dmitri burn The Original of Laura as Vladimir asked, light index card number one (with what, a kitchen match? a lighter made especially for the occasion? toss it into a good wood fire?) and watch the stack of them turn to ash? That’s what he said he wanted. Oops. Did you catch that “he said”? That’s a crack in the door through which Dmitri inserted his foot. Because what did Vladimir really want? Because sometimes he said things that he didn’t mean. We all do. And what we say can run counter to our deepest desire. And the request seems like such a gesture, a Romantic gesture. Dmitri knew his father (he even visited him recently to help him resolve the dilemma!). And he has decided to publish Laura. Scholars and the literary public rejoice!
Personally, I imagine that Vladimir meant what he said: Burn the damn thing. It’s caused me nothing but trouble. I keep getting sick. It’s not done. It’s not good. Yet. (I give him the “yet”.) It will be a weight off my shoulders, and I need to be unencumbered as I pass across the River Styx. Actually, I ‘m sure he wouldn’t say “weight off my shoulders” and I don’t know what his views on the afterworld are. But you get the idea. It’s a reasonable point of view. Dmitri defied his father.
It’s a reasonable point of view, but it’s an unreasonable request. My (imaginary) mother (in this case) might say turn the last pot she touched into a fine powder, but that’s not going to happen. I can imagine her fingers on that clay now, nothing more natural in the world. And really, even unfinished, it’s beautiful. If the craft museum wants to exhibit it, please, by all means… So, sorry Vladimir, I’m with Dmitri on this one. We just are not going to smash your last pot — not even for the pleasure of denying it to the critics and scholars!
A few links: to Ron Rosenbaum, who kept the issue in the press the past few years (he’s having second thoughts); Tom Stoppard’s “burn it” argument; Kathryn Hughes at the Guardian thinks it all might be a grand Nabokovian jest.
2 comments »
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Publish it, but exactly as he left it, and I want to see photocopies of the index cards in the Appendix. And then burn the cards and scatter the ashes. And for the Nabokov experts: Re all the Kafka comments to the Hughes piece. Nabokov taught Kafka. Did he ever discuss Max Brod’s decision to publish Kafka’s work despite his request that it be destroyed?
Comment by Seefeldt — May 5, 2008 @ 8:15 pm
[...] to be published despite Nabokov’s dying request that it be burned. Scatter has considered the dilemma, to burn or not to burn. We’re a bit ambivalent, can see both sides of the match, but [...]
Pingback by Art Scatter » Thirteen ways of looking at The New Yorker — July 6, 2008 @ 12:09 pm