Banned in Sherwood, sold out in Portland
The good news is, I couldn’t get in to Brunish Hall Sunday afternoon to see “Higher Ground” — it was sold out. Maybe you read about it here, on the front page of Monday’s Oregonian, in another of reporter Maya Blackmun’s continuing series on the off-again, on-again production of a play about middle-school bullying that Sherwood Middle School Principal Anna Pittioni deemed too hot for her tots to handle.
It would have been nice to see this sort-of happy ending, with all the cheers for the hard work of the student performers and tekkies and their drama teacher, Jennie Brown, who wrote the script that Principal Pittioni considered too mature for some of the school’s students to deal with. (The kids in the show argued that the script actually watered down everyday reality in the halls of the Sherwood school, a typical sort of place in a typical sort of town, and, you could further argue, a reality that the typical young teen enrolled in the school is already all too familiar with.) But if I’d gotten in, someone else would have been left out (lots of us were turned away at the door), and isn’t that what every producer wants: a sold-out show?
So everybody won, and everything turned out great, right?
Well, no — and it’s important to remember that.
It’s important to remember that the audience the young performers originally wanted to see the play — their fellow students — was mostly blocked from access to it. Unless their parents drove them into Portland for Sunday’s performance (and only parents who were already firmly on the First Amendment bandwagon are likely to have done that) the kids who actually attend the school got the three-monkey treatment: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. And they didn’t get a chance to decide for themselves exactly what “evil” was. Principal Pittioni and the Sherwood school board performed that pesky task for them.
It’s important to remember that what could have been a positive learning experience for the Sherwood community instead became in large part a negative one. Kids learned that when they’re faced with an unreasonable ban, the best thing to do is an end run: They learned to be a little more cynical about the adult world. Administrators learned that, if they can take the heat for a little while, they have the power to effectively keep free speech and an open exploration of ideas out of their schools (which are actually our schools, but let that go). Parents learned that if three or four of them put up enough of a fuss they can put a stop to common sense and common discourse. And people who are deemed in any way “different” learned that if they disagree even mildly with the fairy-tale version of small-town life, they will be kicked even farther out on the margins. I speak, by the way, as an urbanite who grew up in a small town, spends a fair amount of time in small towns and loves small towns, but isn’t Pollyannish about them.
It’s important to recognize that, after all, a lot of good did come out of this unnecessary flap: The whole town of Sherwood, or at least those parts of it that were paying attention, has begun to take a hard look at what it really is. And the kids in the show had their hard work and good intentions validated on a big stage.
But it’s also important to understand that this is a road we’ve been down many times before, and are likely to travel many times again. The free flow of ideas does not happen easily. If it is a core value of the American culture, it is also a value that is continually feared and resisted. There are many skirmishes in the battle over censorship, which is really a battle over control of opinions and beliefs, and its outcome can never be taken for granted.
These little attempts at clamping down on the right to free expression come at the same time, ironically, that American officialdom has never been nosier. Under the stress of 9/11, Americans have been only too happy to be spied on, added to lists, listened in on, searched without warrant, investigated on whim, prodded and generally pried into, all in the name of safety. Just when we need to be more skeptical, more jealous of our privacy, more insistent on a free and accurate flow of information, more demanding of transparency and honesty on the part of our leaders, we seem to have capitulated to the self-appointed managers of free thought. There’s something for the kids in Sherwood to chew on.
Not to get all biblical about this thing, but it strikes me that one passage is pertinent: You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
Except, how can you know the truth if people with power keep trying to hide it from you?
– Bob Hicks
5 comments »
Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Very good post and very true. I was able to see the play and I am glad that I did; it’s just a shame that the people who SHOULD see it, probably did not.
Comment by Recovering Straight Girl — March 10, 2008 @ 2:34 pm
Thanks for a thought-provoking post, bringing up several points that I haven’t seen discussed before. As someone whose child was in the play and who has followed this issue from the beginning, however, may I clarify a few things?
Kids learned that when they’re faced with an unreasonable ban, the best thing to do is an end run: They learned to be a little more cynical about the adult world.
Mmm, maybe. Frankly I think these kids are plenty cynical already. But what I heard the cast say on Sunday was that they learned that they have some power to change things. Nothing wrong with that!
Parents learned that if three or four of them put up enough of a fuss they can put a stop to common sense and common discourse.
At least one of the original three parents who withdrew their child(ren) from the play has said publicly, in the Oregonian and at a recent Sherwood School Board meeting, that she never intended for the play to be cancelled. She made a decision to withdraw her child from the play, but she was basically horrified at the ensuing events. Overall I don’t believe that the parents were a vigilante group, but rather that the decisions were made by the administration for its own reasons.
Comment by Satchel — March 10, 2008 @ 8:29 pm
Ah… but there’s a rumor it will show again this weekend!
Let me know if you’d like us to set aside a ticket if it does. I am sorry you missed it on Sunday- it was great.
Comment by Ria Torricelli — March 10, 2008 @ 9:21 pm
Alert: Sherwood administrators confiscated Ms Brown’s computer last week (before play was performed in Portland). When the computer was returned, Ms. Brown’s email was changed to: jebrown@sherwood.k12.or.us
If you have tried to contact her, those emails are probably going to the administration. It would be a shame if messages from well wishers and friends of “Higher Ground” are not being received by the proper owner. Please make a note of her new address. Thanks!
Comment by Lisa Pomeroy — March 11, 2008 @ 7:40 am
Thanks, all, for your comments. Satchel, you make good points. While I do think this episode probably has deepened cynicism about the adult world among Sherwood students, this sort of thing isn’t reductive: I’ll bet that at the same time, the experience has been liberating for the kids. (And by the way, I’d like to draw a distinction between cynicism, which becomes an excuse for doing nothing, and healthy skepticism, which is the basis for critical thought.) As to your second point, I’m not surprised. In public discourse things become polarized quickly, and people who thought they were in the middle sometimes find themselves standing for something in public opinion that they had no intention of standing for. Parents have every right to withdraw their children from projects they don’t believe are right for them. That’s a far cry from wanting to kill the project outright, but all too often that leap gets made — and not necessarily by the person directly involved, but by someone else who has an ax to grind. I sympathize with the mother whose private decision appears to have been turned into a political weapon against her wishes.
Ria, if you’ll let Art Scatter know details of any performances coming up this weekend, we’ll spread the word.
– BH
Comment by Bob Hicks — March 11, 2008 @ 9:16 am