‘La Boheme’: glorious, conspicuous consumption

Alyson Cambridge is party-loving Musetta in La Boheme. Photo: Portland Opera/2009

Let’s have a party: Alyson Cambridge fires up the menfolk as flirtatious Musetta in Puccini’s “La Boheme.” Photo: Portland Opera

Art Scatter remembers a time in Portland when the cornucopia of performance was overflowing and Friday evenings confronted culture-hoppers with the sobering reality that despite theoretical breakthroughs in physics and mathematics, mere human beings can still be in only one place at a time.

Oh, wait: That time appears to be now.

Last night saw the openings of the rich American musical Ragtime at Portland Center Stage, the smart playwright Steven Dietz’s comedy Becky’s New Car at Artists Rep, The Indie Concert with leading contemporary dancemakers Mary Oslund and Gregg Bielemeier at Conduit (this one has just one more performance, tonight), acerbic comedian Lewis Black at the Schnitz, Alfred Uhry’s Tony-winning The Last Night at Ballyhoo at Clackamas Rep, and the return of Stephen Sondheim’s modern classic Company at the Winningstad Theatre. Plus some other stuff.

Where to go? What to do?

Kelly Kaduce as Mimi and Arturo Chacon-Cruz as Rodolfo in La Boheme. Photo: Portland OperaWe went for the guts with Portland Opera’s season-opening performance of Giacomo Puccini’s La Boheme, and came away with the glory, too: a lovely, funny, moving production of one of the most glorious operas ever written.

There are those who declare loudly that the 19th century came to a close in 1924 when Puccini died at age 65, and that for all practical purposes opera died with him.

That’s turned out to be a gross misunderstanding of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, both culturally and musically. (When I told a prominent but somewhat ossified classical critic many years ago how much I’d enjoyed the Bartok I’d heard the night before, he snorted and replied: “No, you didn’t. Nobody enjoys Bartok. They only say they enjoy Bartok because they think they’re supposed to enjoy Bartok.”)

Portland Opera’s production, directed by Sandra Bernhard and featuring the gorgeous-toned Kelly Kaduce as the beautiful consumptive Mimi, reminded me that classics are of their own time and place: Boheme, which debuted in Turin, Italy, in 1896, revels in a romanticism and a deep love for melody that simply don’t exist in the contemporary arts vocabulary.

But this production also reminded me that classics (speaking of theories of relativity) don’t age. They are classic because they remain fresh. In Boheme’s case it stays fresh because even though Puccini’s kind of romanticism seems a thing of the past, it is also buried deep in our aesthetic bones: We can’t escape it, and we don’t really want to.

Christopher Mattaliano, Portland Opera’s general manager, makes an interesting case in his program notes for Puccini’s essential modernity:

“His music has become so ubiquitous and his popularity so great that one may forget how truly original he was as an artist.

“He absorbed the modern compositional trends of his time — the use of non-traditional sounds (bells, chimes, sirens, etc.), the experiments in orchestral color and texture being used by Debussy, Mussorgsky and others, and the use of thematic material (think Wagner’s leitmotif) — without becoming a slave to any of it.

“Of course, he also had a natural gift for melody — soaring, irresistible melody, which is what most people associate with his work, and why he’s so popular with the public.

“But all of the above had a singular purpose with Puccini — to serve the drama. … He was an innate man of the theater, and his understanding of theatrical timing and effect is unsurpassed.”

I’ll leave it to others to file detailed reviews of the production (The Oregonian’s David Stabler and Barry Johnson have already turned in their glowing reports on Oregon Live, and blogger/writer extraordinaire Marc Acito has posted his on-the-spot reactions, too) and finish with a few observations:

  • Puccini a consummate man of the theater? Spot on. I noticed it immediately, with the first notes from the orchestra under conductor Antonello Allemandi’s assertive baton. A lot of operas use the overture to sneak softly into the music’s themes, tiptoeing toward previews of coming attractions. Boheme opens with a dramatic bang, as vivid and bold and colorful as the paints on bohemian artist Marcello’s canvas.
  • Glorious street action in Act II. Photo: Portland Opera

  • It’s sad and all that – we all know Mimi dies — but Boheme also has some very funny stretches. Stage director Bernhard plays that up especially in the second-act crowd scenes, and particularly in flirtatious Musetta’s campy frolicking in the restaurant, when her outrageous narcissistic manipulations create a tension of conflict with the soaring beauty of her song, which on record can sound like the essence of purity. This lively act as staged here reflects some of the sly cultural observation of social caricaturists such as Daumier and Toulouse-Lautrec.
  • When do you turn the music off? In Puccini’s shrewd reckoning, right at the end, when Mimi dies. Until that point, the entire opera, even moments of inconsequential dialogue, is fully sung. So when the emotional climax of the evening hits — when everyone except her lover Rodolfo realizes Mimi has died — the singing stops. And the quiet — the stripped-down, simple, unadorned speaking — becomes in its contrast the most eloquent music possible. That’s contemporary. And that’s classic.

——————————-

First inset photo: Oh that this too too solid flesh should fail: Mimi (Kelly Kaduce) and Rodolfo (Arturo Chacon-Cruz) comfort one another as the end nears. Portland Opera.

Second inset photo: Seventy-six trombones and a street parade: the colorful hijinks of Act II. Portland Opera.

7 Responses to “‘La Boheme’: glorious, conspicuous consumption”

  1. Martha Ullman West Says:

    I remember that most contemporary 20th century composer Edgard Varese (the first to use magnetic tape as a means of composition, pre-computer of course) saying that no composer understood the human voice in the way Puccini did. I’m going tomorrow, can’t wait.

  2. Martha Ullman West Says:

    WHAT a lovely La Boheme, I went, I saw, I wept. And how opera direction has changed over the years and for the better. Gone are the days when the large possibly smelly tenor plants his feet and bellows. These singers moved, naturally and expressively, every damn one of them. And yes, Bob, the humor was swell and just enough. I quite loved it. Sets, costumes as well, and how come the people who say that classical ballet is just too expensive an art form for a city like Portland to sustain don’t say the same thing about opera? The ballet company after all seldom imports principals, the way the opera company always does. Humph. This dance critic heartily recommends attending La Boheme (as well as the upcoming season opener at the ballet) and be sure to watch as well as listen.

  3. David Loftus Says:

    Tell your stuffy classical music critic to get stuffed. I LOVE Bartok, and have ever since I was 13 or 14. Out of Doors Suite? Music for Percussion, Strings, and Celesta? The Miraculous Mandarin? Bartok’s da Bomb!

  4. Martha Ullman West Says:

    I agree David Loftus, and my man Todd Bolender did a fantastic ballet using the Miraculous Mandarin, maybe not a ballet, a physical theater piece. That’s an extraordinary score. Bartok’s cello pieces ain’t too shabby either.

  5. Bob Hicks Says:

    This particular classical music critic (a fellow I liked, actually, even though we disagreed aesthetically) had one of the shrewdest critical minds of the 19th century. Unfortunately, our conversation took place about 1977.

  6. Martha Ullman West Says:

    Good grief Bob–you sound like Balanchine, who spoke with Tchaikowsky on a regular basis.

  7. Bob Hicks Says:

    A misunderstanding, Martha. The gentleman in question was PHYSICALLY in 1977 when we spoke. Only his soul was in 1877.

Leave a Reply

a Portland-centric arts and culture blog