Sunday scatter: It was a dark and stormy night in the Rainy North Woods …
Our friend Rose City Reader has a running feature on her lively lit blog she calls Opening Sentence of the Day, and it’s just that — a first sentence that, for some reason, catches her eye and ear and compels her to pass it along.
It’s a great idea, and it’s hers, and no way am I going to steal it, because that would be so wrong. But just this once I’m going to borrow it, because after putting new shelves in the office I’ve been restocking some books that have been sitting in boxes in the basement, and that includes pretty much my entire collection of mysteries, which I’ve now been taking out selectively and re-reading with pleasure.
One of my rediscoveries is Gore Vidal’s three murder mysteries from the early 1950s featuring suave public-relations man Peter Sargeant (Vidal wrote them under the pen name Edgar Box) — Death in the Fifth Position, maybe the best backstage ballet murder mystery ever written; Death Before Bedtime, a maliciously funny evisceration of power, sex and corruption in the nation’s capital; and Death Likes It Hot, a mystery about — well, I can’t remember exactly, because I haven’t read it in a long time and I’ve just begun it again. But its first sentence is so delicious that I just have to take a cue from Rose City Reader and pass it along. (I can’t resist adding the second sentence, too, because it underscores the method of Vidal’s elegant wry comedy):
The death of Peaches Sandoe, the midget, at the hands, or rather feet, of a maddened elephant in the sideshow of the circus at Madison Square Garden was at first thought to be an accident, the sort of tragedy you’re bound to run into from time to time if you run a circus with both elephants and midgets in it. A few days later, though, there was talk of foul play.
Ah, the wonderful tastelessness of it all! Isn’t that what we long for in a comedy-of-manners murder mystery, even moreso than an alibi-proof plot?
And that got me thinking of my old friend and fellow ink-stained wretch Vince Kohler, who died too early, at age 53, several years ago, but not before creating his wonderfully seedy reprobate of an amateur sleuth, Eldon Larkin, an “overweight, oversexed reporter” on a daily newspaper in a mythical town on the southern Oregon coast. (Kohler, who when I knew him was a reporter for The Oregonian, where Berkeley escapee Eldon hoped a good scoop might someday land him a job, was once a reporter at the Coos Bay World.)
Every now and again somebody puts together one of those lists of Essential Books About Oregon That You Must Read Before You Drown, and they’re all very serious and pioneerish with a dash of Ken Kesey and Ursula LeGuin to prove they know a good yarn when they see one, but Vince’s Eldon Larkin mysteries never seem to get mentioned (although fellow gothic fabulist Katherine Dunn and her Geek Love do), and in an English and History department sense I guess I sort of understand but on the other hand it kind of saddens me, and I also think it might be a mistake. Because Vince, in the shabby person and jaundiced eye of the ever-yearning, ever-disappointed Eldon Larkin, captured so much of the soggy unsung essence of what old-line Oregon is all about — and he did it in a vulgar, overblown, cheesily entertaining style that’s easy to look down on until you try to pull it off yourself.
Plotting was the least of his worries, Vince once mentioned: He just figured out where he wanted the story to end, then worked backwards to see how he was going to get there. And it tended to be a wild reverse-gear ride. His first Eldon Larkin novel, Rainy North Woods, starts out (or ends up, in the reverse-plotting process) with a situation similar to Vidal’s in Death Likes It Hot, as Larkin discovers when a phone call interrupts his clam-chowder lunch at the waterfront greasy spoon:
Fiske, his editor, was on the line. “Some kinda Chinaman’s been stomped to death by an elephant at the circus –”
“I’m on my way,” said Eldon, feeling adrenaline heat his face.
Elephant squashes Chinaman! It was the craziest thing since the belly dancer who could eat glass. The craziest thing since he had received the notice in the mail from Berkeley that his divorce was final, two years ago.
As things turn out, the “Chinaman” was a Vietnamese refugee, one of a large group who have settled up-bay in the years immediately after the war, and who live largely on their own, with only passing acknowledgement from the old-time fishermen, roustabouts, waitresses, druggies, teen-age moms and assorted hangers-on in this depressed and depressing corner of the nation. And as things turn out, the death was no accident: The elephant was hopped to its eyelids on drugs, and the murderer knew it was going to be frantic and confused enough to engage in a good stomping.
The violence in Rainy North Woods is comic-book gothic — the elephant gets winched up and hanged (very messy); a femme fatale gets a file shoved in her eye (very bloody) — but weirdly appropriate given the embarrassment of incident in Kohler’s tale. We get Bigfoot, UFOs, a smarmy Boy Scout, frat-boy drug runners, a lovelorn circus fat lady, a terrorized immigrant community, a long-lost silent movie star and lots more, some of it incidental flavoring, most of it part of the forest-thick tangle of the plot.
What impresses me, besides the tasteless fun of the thing, is how Kohler homed in on the quiet desperation and exultant looniness of our corner of the planet, a gothic lushness of dead ends and closed-mindedness that seems to sprout with the weeds in the rain. The sense of wet and misery can remind you of H.L. Davis’s Honey in the Horn or Kesey’s Sometimes a Great Notion or the homeless lineups for lunch at the missions in Old Town. And I love Kohler’s ability to convey that even in a place as hidebound as Oregon, things change — and that the change comes not just from the suits in the corporate towers but also, and maybe more essentially, from the losers and escapees and newcomers and outsiders and roughnecks and oddball utopians who seem drawn to this place and sunk hip-deep into its wild fertile ground. The Vietnam vets, hiding in the woods and refighting their personal wars. The Asian immigrants, starting over in a befuddling place. The out-of-work mill hands, slowly realizing that times have changed. In Oregon we’re slow, but there’s at least a fighting chance we might get there, to some sort of accommodation with the outside world. In the guise of his diverting comic mysteries, Kohler had a feel for all that.
Vince wrote three more Eldon Larkin mysteries after Rainy North Woods, and they’re worth keeping an eye out for: Rising Dog, Banjo Boy, Raven’s Widows. Maybe they aren’t high lit. But long before the bumper sticker started showing up everywhere, they were pointing out how the strangest people keep Oregon weird.
April 26th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
[...] Original post by Art Scatter [...]
April 27th, 2009 at 8:24 am
How did I escape the Vince Kohler mysteries? Great post Bob, but I take issue with Death in the Fifth Position being the best backstage ballet mystery ever. It’s good all right, but A Bullet in theBallet and Murder a la Stroganoff are better. If dated. These were written in the late 40s, early 50s by Caryl Brahms, an out of work dance critic (ahem) and S.J. Simon who wrote about bridge (as in the game, not the bloody thing everyone’s arguing about to go over the Columbia) for I think the Times of London. The characters are marvelous–a ballet mistress who goes backstage after a performance to tell the prima ballerina how badly she has danced that night, Stroganoff himself who is an impresario modeled on Diaghilev. His English is a good deal like Danilova’s–utterly fractured and completely charming. Edgar Box bases one of his characters in Death in the Fifth Position on her, incidentally. Alas they are out of print, but they’re worth hunting for on Biblio.com.
April 27th, 2009 at 10:24 am
Aha! Even with my weasel word “maybe” the best … you caught me. (We professional writers use “maybe” and “perhaps” a lot when we’re not quite sure of something but want to sound as if we are.) I don’t know the Brahms/Simon novels, and it sounds as if I’m going to have look for them. Why does “Murder a la Stroganoff” sound like bad dinner theater to me?
April 27th, 2009 at 10:41 am
Steal away! This is great stuff.
My “Opening Sentence” thing is just me keeping track of EVERY opening sentence I read — well, at least for books I read with my eyes, not audio books. I end up posting a lot of boring opening sentences. So far none of them involved elephants. Or even midgets.
Maybe that will change when I find these Gore and Kohler — and now Brahms and Simon — mysteries. I am going to be on the look out.
April 27th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Words that beg the question: arguably, perhaps, maybe, widely believed, it has been said that, Art Scatterers are invited by me muw to contribute to this list.
April 27th, 2009 at 12:45 pm
My fave: Mayhap, which is oddly singular. Perhap (intended) a cross between maybe and mishap, or a poetic (OK, lazy) conjunction of maybe happen. Weasel all the way!
April 27th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
Yes, a list! I almost added “arguably” to my original comment but didn’t because I never use it — it’s arguably (heh-heh) the ugliest weasel word in the language.
Part of the point of the weasel word is to not offend. When you say “maybe” or “perhaps” it’s partly shorthand for “Now, I think this is the case, but of course I could be wrong, and you, gentle reader, in your wisdom that exceeds my own, will of course know the truth of the matter and undoubtedly enlighten my dark corner of ignorance.” All very polite and civilized.
“Arguably,” on the other hand, is bellicose from the get-go. It’s shorthand for, “Of course, any fool knows this to be true, but just in case you’re a SPECIAL sort of fool who is so thick-headed the truth bounces off your skull, I challenge you to an intellectual duel. And after I’ve slain you I’ll spit on your grave.” Very uncivilized. Very Bushian.
April 27th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Too fun not to share. At dictionary.com, the origin for mayhap is 1530–40, and it says it’s short for, get this, may hap. Duh. Whatever hap is. But some of the delicious related words: peradventure, perchance and (the oft used) possibly.
April 27th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
“Some say …” or the passive, “It has been said that …” seems to be popular in the media.
I know we’re never supposed to start a sentence with “I think …” or “In my opinion …” (”Of course you think it! That’s why you’re writing it!” shouts the editor). But sometimes those phrases can help hedge your bet–a way to say, “I may be wrong about this, but …”
April 27th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
Seems. Seemingly. Likely.
My three favorites in legal briefs. But I use “arguably” a LOT — we lawyers like bellicose. And the tone is EXACTLY as Bob describes.
April 27th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
“With all due respect …” which pretty much implies that no respect is due. IMHO.
April 28th, 2009 at 8:01 am
Who are you calling Bushian, Mr. Hicks? she says in arguably bellicose fashion. It’s a four syllable word, for god’s sake: do you think the former leader of the less than free world could even pronounce it, let alone read it? Step outside please and let us pelt each other with vocabulary. Which is all by way of saying I’ve been using arguably quite a lot in an endless ditty on the Balanchine Ballerina for a forthcoming 2 vol reference book(s) on American Dance Icons. And why am I using this admittedly ugly word? In order to beg the question of course. There are few actual facts about the iconic Balanchine ballerina, who comes in many shapes and sizes, mostly thin, mostly tall, but not always, and who is intensely musical, but not always, and moves with the speed of light, but not always, and was trained at the School of American Ballet, but not always–you get the picture. I am now looking up alternatives to arguably in The Saurus. We call it that in my family because my grandmother, who was also a writer, took hers, which was well-used, for repair, to a Parisian bookbinder, who knowing it was a book in English, labeled it that way. Mercy me, my 1946 edition (not my grandmother’s) doesn’t even contain the word arguably. Oh woe, oh help, oh hell and damnation. Mayhap I should use something else, something less argumentative, less bellicose, less challenging, but what?!
May 5th, 2009 at 8:03 pm
[...] peculiar culture that is her milieu. So, borrowing a page once again from Rose City Reader (I know, I said I’d do this only once — I lied) here’s the beginning of the book: Above all, Wall Street is power. The talk [...]
June 12th, 2009 at 8:56 pm
[...] oceanfront I’ve come to love. Not that I get out here very often. Regular readers may recall this post about Vince, a kind of forgotten hero of Oregon literature, and his shambling news-hound hero, [...]